Geometrical restoration during total hip arthroplasty is related to change in gait pattern - a study based on computed tomography and three-dimensional gait analysis

Table 4 Multiple linear regression analyses evaluating effect of change in geometrical restoration on change in gait pattern

Model 1. Multiple linear regression analysis, change in hip rotation during walking after THA defined as the dependent variable.
n = 65	Unstandardized B	p-value	95% CI	R² model
Change in hip anteversion	0.34	0.003	[0.12, 0.57]	0.240
Change in pelvic rotation	−0.69	0.004	[−1.15, − 0.23]
Change in walking speed	0.001	0.758	[−0.01, 0.01]
Model 2. Multiple linear regression analysis, change in max hip adduction moment (1st peak) during walking after THA defined as the dependent variable.
n = 65	Unstandardized B	p-value	95% CI	R² model
Change in FO/AO (quota)	4.02	0.985	[− 416, 424]	0.435
Change in trunk obliquity	17.39	0.001	[7.01, 27.78]
Change in pelvic obliquity	17.98	< 0.001	[8.81, 27.13]
Change in walking speed	0.23	0.002	[0.08, 0.37]

Statistically significant differences are highlighted in bold. The Unstandardized B represents the amount by which the dependent variable changes if an independent variable is changed by one unit keeping other independent variables constant
n number, THA total hip arthroplasty, CI confidence interval, FO femoral offset, AO acetabular offset

ISSN: 1471-2474